Agenda, decisions and minutes
Venue: C1, 1st Floor, Town Hall, Mulberry Place, 5 Clove Crescent, London, E14 2BG
Contact: Matthew Mannion, Democratic Services Tel: 020 7364 4651, E-mail: matthew.mannion@towerhamlets.gov.uk
Media
No. | Item | |
---|---|---|
APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE To receive any apologies for absence. Additional documents: Minutes: Apologies for absence were received on behalf of: · Melanie Clay (Corporate Director, Law, Probity and Governance) – Mark Noman (Legal Advisor) was deputising. · Debbie Jones (Corporate Director, Children’s Services) – Kate Bingham (Service Head, Resources) was deputising.
|
||
DECLARATIONS OF DISCLOSABLE PECUNIARY INTERESTS PDF 73 KB To note any declarations of interest made by Members, including those restricting Members from voting on the questions detailed in Section 106 of the Local Government Finance Act, 1992. See attached note from the Monitoring Officer.
Additional documents: Minutes: There were no Declarations of Disclosable Pecuniary Interest. However, Councillor Amy Whitelock Gibbs reported for transparency that her partner was involved in the Friends of Bow Primary School group who were making a submission to Cabinet on Agenda Item 5.7 (Planning for School Places 2016/17).
|
||
UNRESTRICTED MINUTES PDF 168 KB The unrestricted minutes of the Cabinet meeting held on 26th July, 2016 are presented for approval. Additional documents: Minutes: RESOLVED
1. That the unrestricted minutes of the Cabinet meeting held on Tuesday 26 July 2016 be approved and signed by the Chair as a correct record of proceedings.
|
||
OVERVIEW & SCRUTINY COMMITTEE Additional documents: |
||
Chair's Advice of Key Issues or Questions PDF 57 KB Chair of Overview and Scrutiny Committee (OSC) to report on any issues raised by the OSC in relation to unrestricted business to be considered.
Additional documents:
Minutes: Pre-Scrutiny Questions were submitted by the Overview and Scrutiny Committee on Agenda Items 5.1 (Medium Term Financial Strategy 2017/20) and 5.5 (Procurement of Cleaning and Associated Services Contract).
They were considered when those items were taken.
In addition, Councillor John Pierce, Chair of the Overview and Scrutiny Committee, provided Cabinet with an update on their meeting the previous week. He explained that the Committee had considered a number of issues including: · A request received to disallow the Call-In period for an individual mayoral decision on the Academy Conversion of St Paul’s Way Trust School. The implications of this request to Scrutiny of not being able to call-in issues and the best way of handling such requests in the future were debated. · The Police Commander had spoken at the meeting. He talked about his priorities including around Anti-Social Behaviour and violence with injury (including domestic violence). · A discussion on the Scrutiny review of Town Centres. · A Joseph Rowntree report on poverty and the clear role for Councils in meeting that challenge. · How Scrutiny was preparing for its role in examining the Council’s budget proposals that were due to be presented to Council in February 2017 and in particular the importance of receiving proper business cases for changes. · That adverts were out looking to recruit Co-opted Members to the Grants Scrutiny Sub-Committee. Thanks were also given to Mr Nozrul Mustafa who had stood down as a Co-optee of the Overview and Scrutiny Committee after a number of years’ valuable service.
The Mayor thanked Councillor John Pierce for his update and for the work of the Overview and Scrutiny Committee.
|
||
Any Unrestricted Decisions "Called in" by the Overview & Scrutiny Committee (Under provisions of Article 6 Para 6.02 V of the Constitution). Additional documents: Minutes: Nil items.
|
||
Medium Term Financial Strategy 2017 - 2020 PDF 152 KB Additional documents: Decision: The Pre-Decision Scrutiny Questions and responses were noted.
DECISION
1. To endorse the Council’s Outcomes Based Budgeting approach to prioritising resources and the move to a rolling multi-year Medium Term Financial Strategy from 2017-18 to 2019-2020.
2. To note the issues and actions set out in this report which are informing the development of the Council’s MTFS for 2017 – 2020.
3. To note the timescales and next steps for reviewing and consulting on budget proposals;
Action by: CORPORATE DIRECTOR, RESOURCES (Z. COOKE) (Service Head, Finance and Procurement (N. Murton)
Minutes: Councillor David Edgar, Cabinet Member for Resources, introduced the report setting out the Council’s Medium Term Financial Strategy. He outlined that a new approach was being undertaken this year know as outcome based budgeting which looked to link budgets to the Council’s priorities. It was noted that the funding settlement details would be updated as the government provided more information on areas such as business rates.
The Administration’s final proposals would be presented to Council in February for consideration. Councillor David Edgar then reviewed the submitted Pre-Decision Scrutiny Question and answer provided.
The Mayor highlighted the challenge in resolving a budget that was likely to be around £60 million smaller in three years’ time. He agreed the recommendations as set out in the report.
RESOLVED
1. To endorse the Council’s Outcomes Based Budgeting approach to prioritising resources and the move to a rolling multi-year Medium Term Financial Strategy from 2017-18 to 2019-2020.
2. To note the issues and actions set out in this report which are informing the development of the Council’s MTFS for 2017 – 2020.
3. To note the timescales and next steps for reviewing and consulting on budget proposals;
|
||
Best Value Action Plan Update, September 2016 PDF 89 KB Additional documents: Decision: DECISION
1. To agree the 6 monthly update prior to submission to the Secretary of State.
Action by: CORPORATE DIRECTOR, LAW, PROBITY AND GOVERNANCE (M. CLAY) (Acting Service Head, Corporate Strategy and Equalities (K. Kewin)
Minutes: The Mayor introduced the report. He explained that the Best Value Action Plan had been prepared in response to the intervention of the Secretary of State and the Commissioners. The report presented to Cabinet was in a draft form and would be revised a little before being submitted to the Secretary of State. It was noted that more than 95% of actions had now been completed and therefore it was hoped that certain of the directions would be lifted following the next review.
Noting that the report would be updated before being presented, the Mayor agreed the recommendation as set out.
RESOLVED
1. To agree the 6 monthly update prior to submission to the Secretary of State.
|
||
Boroughwide 20mph Limit PDF 156 KB Additional documents:
Decision: The Mayor amended the recommendations and then agreed them.
DECISION
1. To agree that the 20mph speed limit Experimental Order is made permanent subject to Leamouth Road and Leamouth Roundabout being omitted from the traffic order and reverting to 30mph.
2. To agree that the roads listed in 5.10 be prioritised for additional traffic calming to reinforce the 20 mph speed limit.
3. To note that further work will continue to review road safety throughout the borough in order to target ongoing traffic calming work to those areas most in need of improvements.
4. To note that further awareness and education programmes will be delivered to build awareness and ownership of the 20 mph limit.
Action by: CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND ACTING CORPORATE DIRECTOR, COMMUNITIES, LOCALITIES AND CULTURE (W. TUCKLEY) (Head of Engineering (M. Cooper) (Acting Team Leader Design (Road Safety and Cycling) (T. Rawlings)
Minutes: Councillor Ayas Miah, Cabinet Member for Environment, introduced the report reviewing the experimental 20MPH zone implemented throughout the Borough. He drew Members’ attention to the statistics contained with the report on driver behaviour since the zone had been introduced and the survey looking at levels of support for the pilot.
Whilst the data was not conclusive it was considered that analysis showed the scheme had improved road safety and so it was worth making it permanent. However, there were a few specific roads where it was proposed the speed limit be returned to 30 MPH and those were listed in the report.
Councillor Andrew Wood, Ward Councillor for Canary Wharf, addressed the meeting. Whilst he supported the principle of encouraging 20MPH roads, he considered that there were a number of locations, such as Manchester Road on the Isle of Dogs, where the lower speed limit was causing dangerous situations such as undertaking and increased collisions. He suggested that the data presented was not robust enough to take a decision to make the scheme permanent.
The Cabinet then moved to discuss the report. In particular they looked at: · The statistics, especially around accidents involving personal injury/fatalities. · The overall decrease in speeds by 1.4MPH, in line with targets. · How quickly road calming measures could be brought in to tackle problem areas. · Levels of public support for the speed reductions.
The was strong support expressed for the proposals and Members also proposed that Prestons Road, Cotton Street and West India Dock Road should be retained within the 20MPH zone but that the design review should be expedited to tackle any issues on those roads. Prestons Roundabout should also, therefore, be retained within the 20MPH zone.
The Mayor amended the recommendations as set out above and then agreed them emphasising that it was important that relevant traffic calming measures be brought in on the above roads as soon as possible.
RESOLVED
1. To agree that the 20mph speed limit Experimental Order is made permanent subject to Leamouth Road and Leamouth Roundabout being omitted from the traffic order and reverting to 30mph.
2. To agree that the roads listed in 5.10 be prioritised for additional traffic calming to reinforce the 20 mph speed limit.
3. To note that further work will continue to review road safety throughout the borough in order to target ongoing traffic calming work to those areas most in need of improvements.
4. To note that further awareness and education programmes will be delivered to build awareness and ownership of the 20 mph limit.
|
||
Social Impact Bond Pan-London Care Impact Partnership PDF 299 KB Additional documents: Decision: DECISION
1. To authorise the Corporate Director of Children’s Services to act as the lead commissioner for the Pan-London Care Impact Partnership.
2. To authorise the Corporate Director of Children’s Services to enter into a contract with the Social Impact Bond provider to support young people and their families in Tower Hamlets.
3. Following consultation with the Corporate Director for Children’s Services, authorise the Service Head - Legal Services to execute all necessary contract documents in respect of the awards of the Pan-London Care Impact Partnership and an outcomes based contract on behalf of Tower Hamlets.
Action by: CORPORATE DIRECTOR, CHILDREN’S SERVICES (D. JONES) (Service Head, Resources (K. Bingham)
Minutes: Councillor Rachael Saunders, Deputy Mayor and Cabinet Member for Education and Children’s Services, introduced the report. She explained that this project involved the Children’s Services directorate working with the Greater London Authority (GLA) and 5 other London Boroughs to develop a social impact bond funded service to prevent adolescents from entering the care system. She considered that this leading edge project was a very good way of providing the best possible support to these young people.
The Mayor welcomed the report highlighting how important the safety of vulnerable young people was to the Authority. He was looking forward to receiving progress reports and he agreed the recommendations as set out.
RESOLVED
1. To authorise the Corporate Director of Children’s Services to act as the lead commissioner for the Pan-London Care Impact Partnership.
2. To authorise the Corporate Director of Children’s Services to enter into a contract with the Social Impact Bond provider to support young people and their families in Tower Hamlets.
3. Following consultation with the Corporate Director for Children’s Services, authorise the Service Head - Legal Services to execute all necessary contract documents in respect of the awards of the Pan-London Care Impact Partnership and an outcomes based contract on behalf of Tower Hamlets.
|
||
Procurement of Cleaning and Associated Services Contract PDF 143 KB Additional documents: Decision: The Pre-Decision Scrutiny Questions and responses were noted.
DECISION
1. To authorise the re-procurement and subsequent awarding of a cleaning and associated services contract for a term of five years with the option to extend for a further year based on service provision, subject to best value considerations being satisfied
2. To authorise a two month extension to the existing contract arrangement to enable the re-procured contract to commence on 3 July 2017.
3. To note that funding for the procurement exercise is through the General Fund revenue accounts across the various Council services
4. To delegate authority to the Corporate Director of Development and Renewal following consultation with the Lead Member to enter into all necessary agreements to give effect to the decisions in recommendations 1 and 2
5. To authorise the Service Head – Legal Services after consultation with the Corporate Director of Development and Renewal to execute and enter into all necessary agreements
Action by: CORPORATE DIRECTOR, DEVELOPMENT AND RENEWAL (A. DALVI) (Interim Head of Facilities Management (S. Raishbrook)
Minutes: Councillor David Edgar, Cabinet Member for Resources, introduced the report on the proposed approach to the re-procurement of the cleaning and associated services contracts. He highlighted the locations involved and the list of services required. He noted the Pre-Decision Scrutiny Question and the answer provided. It was noted than an in-house bid was welcome but not necessarily expected due to the size and complexity of the contracts listed.
The Mayor noted the discussion and agreed the recommendations as set out in the report.
RESOLVED
1. To authorise the re-procurement and subsequent awarding of a cleaning and associated services contract for a term of five years with the option to extend for a further year based on service provision, subject to best value considerations being satisfied
2. To authorise a two month extension to the existing contract arrangement to enable the re-procured contract to commence on 3 July 2017.
3. To note that funding for the procurement exercise is through the General Fund revenue accounts across the various Council services
4. To delegate authority to the Corporate Director of Development and Renewal following consultation with the Lead Member to enter into all necessary agreements to give effect to the decisions in recommendations 1 and 2
5. To authorise the Service Head – Legal Services after consultation with the Corporate Director of Development and Renewal to execute and enter into all necessary agreements
|
||
Housing Strategy 2016 - 2021 PDF 130 KB Additional documents:
Decision: DECISION
1. To approve the draft Housing Strategy and attached appendices for consultation.
2. To note the responses to the 1st stage consultation.
3. To note the arrangements for the second stage consultation.
Action by: CORPORATE DIRECTOR, DEVELOPMENT AND RENEWAL (A. DALVI) (Housing Strategy Manager (M. Ling)
Minutes: Councillor Rachel Blake, Cabinet Member for Strategic Development introduced the report. She explained that the purpose of the report was to bring the strategy to the second stage consultation. Major concerns noted to date included on affordable housing and how many residents were being forced to leave the borough or pay high rents for low quality housing. There were also concerns around the impact of population growth, and how the Housing and Planning Act would worsen the housing crisis.
A number of strategies were proposed including promoting rights for private tenants and creating a housing company to deliver new homes.
The final strategy would be presented to Council in November 2016 for approval.
The Mayor thanked officers for the work they had undertaken on this project and in particular thanked Jackie Odunoye, Head of Strategy, Regeneration and Sustainability who was leaving the Council after many years’ good work. He also noted the importance of engaging with partners and as such welcomed the presentation to the Health and Wellbeing Board. He noted that too many residents were being pushed out of the Borough.
He agreed the recommendations as set out.
RESOLVED
1. To approve the draft Housing Strategy and attached appendices for consultation.
2. To note the responses to the 1st stage consultation.
3. To note the arrangements for the second stage consultation.
|
||
Planning for School Places - 2016/17 Review PDF 202 KB Additional documents: Decision: The Mayor amended the recommendations and then agreed them.
DECISION
1. To note the contents of this report and the progress made in meeting the need for additional places;
2. To note that proposals for specific schemes will be subject to separate consultation and procedures and Cabinet decisions;
3. To agree that the initial consultation on the specification for the new Bromley Hall Primary School and Bow Primary School should proceed.
Action by: CORPORATE DIRECTOR, CHILDREN’S SERVICES (D. JONES) (Head of Building Development (P. Watson)
Minutes: Councillor Rachael Saunders, Deputy Mayor and Cabinet Member for Children’s Services, introduced the report. She explained that the report was looking at how to increase school places in the future including methods of commissioning new schools. She noted the government’s Free School presumption and the impact that would have.
She then turned to look at Bow School in particular explaining why the statistics were suggesting changes in demand for places that needed further examination.
Rachel Ellman and colleagues from the Friends of Bow Primary School addressed the meeting. She expressed strong reservations to the suggestion that the development of Bow Primary School was being postponed until 2019. She highlighted the impact this was already having on local parents including those potentially taking the decision to move away over concern for school access.
Councillor Andrew Wood also addressed the meeting. He raised concerns about creating unpredictability in the supply of places and what message that gave to parents. As a general issue he was also concerned about air pollution near schools and requested that this be considered in relation to the planning for new school places.
There was a general discussion of the report during which it was proposed that the consultation process for Bow Primary School should continue at the same time as for Bromley Hall. That way, the data could be examined further and the opening of the school could be brought forward if that was found to be necessary.
The Mayor thanked everyone for their contributions and noted the issues raised, in particular around air pollution. He agreed the recommendations as amended in respect of the consultation period.
DECISION
1. To note the contents of this report and the progress made in meeting the need for additional places;
2. To note that proposals for specific schemes will be subject to separate consultation and procedures and Cabinet decisions;
3. To agree that the initial consultation on the specification for the new Bromley Hall Primary School and Bow Primary School should proceed.
|
||
Additional documents:
Decision: DECISION
1. To note the challenge session report.
2. To approve the proposed action plan in response to the recommendations.
Action by: CORPORATE DIRECTOR, RESOURCES (Z. COOKE) (Acting Service Head, Corporate Strategy and Equalities (K. Kewin) (Interim Service Head, HR and Workforce Development (S Young)
Minutes: The Mayor introduced the report following the Overview and Scrutiny Committee review looking at ways of improving disabled and ethnic minority representation at senior officer levels within the Council. He thanked Councillor Md. Maium Miah who had led the review and he noted that the response of the Executive accepted the recommendations, many of which were already being progressed.
The Mayor agreed the recommendations as set out in the report.
RESOLVED
1. To note the challenge session report.
2. To approve the proposed action plan in response to the recommendations.
|
||
Additional documents:
Decision: DECISION
Action by: CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND ACTING CORPORATE DIRECTOR, COMMUNITIES, LOCALITIES AND CULTURE (W. TUCKLEY) (Corporate Strategy and Equalities Officer (V. Allen)
Minutes: The Mayor introduced the report of the Overview and Scrutiny Committee looking at ways of improving recycling rates within the Borough. It was noted that many of the issues would be covered in the retendering process for the waste contract but that it was important to note that progress was also being made outside of that process.
RESOLVED
|
||
Corporate Directors Decisions PDF 86 KB Additional documents:
Decision: DECISION
1. To note the Corporate Directors’ decisions set out in Appendix 1.
Action by: CORPORATE DIRECTOR, RESOURCES (Z. COOKE) (Accountant – Financial Planning (A. Kadir)
Minutes: The Mayor introduced the report listing recent Corporate Director Decisions and agreed the recommendation as set out.
RESOLVED
1. To note the Corporate Directors’ decisions set out in Appendix 1.
|
||
Additional documents:
Decision: The Mayor agreed the reasons for urgency as set out in the report.
DECISION
1. To approve the adoption of the revised Regulation 123 List and Planning Obligations SPD (as set out in Appendix A and B to the report).
2. To formally withdraw the previous Regulation 123 List adopted by the Council on 25th February 2015.
3. To formally revoke the Planning Obligations SPD adopted by the Council on 11th January 2012.
Action by: CORPORATE DIRECTOR, DEVELOPMENT AND RENEWAL (A. DALVI) (Service Head, Building and Planning Control (O. Whalley)
Minutes: The Mayor agreed the reasons for urgency as set out below:
Due to a failure of the Committee administrative software, the report was published five days in advance of the meeting but not five clear days. Therefore, as pursuant to Rule 6.1 of the Access to Information Procedure Rules before the item can be considered, the Mayor needs to be satisfied that by reasons of special circumstances the item should be considered as a matter of urgency.
The Mayor believes that it is necessary for this particular report to be considered on 6 September as any delay would have detrimental consequences on the Council’s capacity to secure S106 obligations which mitigate the impact of a particular development. The special circumstances being in this instance that failure to proceed after 6 September without a revised Regulation 123 List and Planning Obligations SPD would mean that the Council did not have an up to date foundation upon which to continue to apply S106 obligations within the limitations set out in the CIL Regulations.
Councillor Rachel Blake, Cabinet Member for Strategic Development introduced the report. She explained that the documents attached had been out for consultation and had previously been presented to Cabinet. It was noted that it was important to be clear on what types of contributions would be expected of developers and that the money spent should be balanced between tackling local and wider implications of the developments.
RESOLVED
1. To approve the adoption of the revised Regulation 123 List and Planning Obligations SPD (as set out in Appendix A and B to the report).
2. To formally withdraw the previous Regulation 123 List adopted by the Council on 25th February 2015.
3. To formally revoke the Planning Obligations SPD adopted by the Council on 11th January 2012.
|
||
ANY OTHER UNRESTRICTED BUSINESS CONSIDERED TO BE URGENT Additional documents: Minutes: Nil items.
|
||
EXCLUSION OF THE PRESS AND PUBLIC In view of the contents of the remaining items on the agenda, the Committee is recommended to adopt the following motion:
“That, under the provisions of Section 100A of the Local Government Act, 1972 as amended by the Local Government (Access to Information) Act, 1985, the Press and Public be excluded from the remainder of the meeting for the consideration of the Section Two business on the grounds that it contains information defined as Exempt in Part 1 of Schedule 12A to the Local Government, Act 1972”.
EXEMPT/CONFIDENTIAL SECTION (PINK)
Additional documents: Minutes: Nil items.
|
||
EXEMPT / CONFIDENTIAL MINUTES The exempt / confidential minutes of the Cabinet meeting held on 26th July, 2016 are presented for approval. Additional documents: Minutes: Nil items.
|
||
OVERVIEW & SCRUTINY COMMITTEE Additional documents: |
||
Chair's Advice of Key Issues or Questions in Relation to Exempt / Confidential Business Chair of Overview and Scrutiny Committee (OSC) to report on any issues raised by the OSC in relation to exempt/confidential business to be considered.
Additional documents: Minutes: Nil items.
|
||
Any Exempt / Confidential Decisions "Called in" by the Overview & Scrutiny Committee (Under provisions of Article 6 Para 6.02 V of the Constitution). Additional documents: Minutes: Nil items.
|
||
ANY OTHER EXEMPT/ CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS CONSIDERED TO BE URGENT Additional documents: Minutes: Nil items.
|