Agenda and minutes
Venue: Committee Room One - Town Hall, Mulberry Place, 5 Clove Crescent, London, E14 2BG. View directions
Contact: David Knight Email: David.knight@towerhamlets.gov.uk
Media
No. | Item |
---|---|
STANDING ITEMS OF BUSINESS Additional documents: |
|
Welcome and Introductions To receive apologies for absence and subsequently the Chair to welcome those present to the meeting and request introductions.
Additional documents: Minutes: The Chair Councillor Rachel Blake (Deputy Mayor and Cabinet Member for Adults, Health and Wellbeing) welcomed everybody to the meeting. |
|
Declarations of Disclosable Pecuniary Interests PDF 215 KB To note any declarations of interest made by members of the Board. (See attached note of Monitoring Officer).
Additional documents: Minutes: There were no declarations of disclosable pecuniary interest were received at the meeting.
|
|
Minutes of the Previous Meeting and Matters Arising PDF 369 KB To confirm as a correct record the minutes of the meeting of the Tower Hamlets Health and Wellbeing Board held on 2nd November, 2021. Also to consider matters arising.
Additional documents: Minutes: The Chair Moved and it was: -
RESOLVED
The unrestricted minutes of the last meeting were confirmed as a correct record and the Chair was authorised to sign them accordingly.
In addition, the Board was reminded that at the last meeting the following changes to the Terms of Reference been made due to Local CCGs coming together to form NEL CCG, it was: i. Agreed that a suitable clinical representation from the NHS North East London CCG be identified. It was noted that Dr Sam Everington will remain in this role for now. ii. Agreed that it is expected that a quarter of the membership attend Board meetings physically as per Terms of Reference to ensure meetings are quorate. Health and Wellbeing Board Terms of Reference held an additional premise that the quarter of the membership ‘included at least one Elected Member of the Council and one representative from the NHS Tower Hamlets Clinical Commissioning Group.’ As there is no legal precedent for this requirement, it had been agreed to remove this additional premise from the Terms of Reference. iii. Agreed to revisit the Terms of Reference in the near future to reflect on proposed changes resulting from changes to the (i) NHS governance arrangements; and (ii) health landscape.
|
|
Chairs Update Additional documents: Minutes: Home care re-procurement Noted that work is continuing with the home care re-procurement, with the expectation that the new service model will: a) have a clearer focus on outcomes, enabling support to be delivered in more creative, flexible, and innovative ways b) be person centred and strength based with service users at the centre of their support and care planning c) exploit the opportunities for integration with health e.g., closer working between home care and district nursing d) ensure providers are connected to local assets and networks and communities, working in partnership with community provision to add value and improve
In, addition, it was noted that a draft service specification is in the process of being compiled; this has been informed by a series of co-production events with services users and their carers, alongside feedback from market engagement activity. The new contracts will be in place by August 2022. Tower Hamlets Connection Network Noted that:
|
|
ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION Additional documents: |
|
Health and Wellbeing Story PDF 4 MB The Board will received a presentation on the experience of living with Physical disabilities in the pandemic. Additional documents: Minutes: The Board received and noted a presentation about Real a user-led organisation run by disabled people who live, work, volunteer, or study in Tower Hamlets. An outline of the main points arising from the questioning after the presentation is set out below:
The Board:
v Was informed that Real supports disabled people of all impairment types, all age groups, all ethnicities, and all other protected characteristics. v Understood that Real is driven by and committed to both the social model of disability and the human rights model of disability. They recognise that people are disabled, not by their impairment, but by the physical, communication, attitudinal, financial, and legal barriers, and discriminatory behaviours and practices, which limit disabled people’s equal status in society whether at an individual or group level. v Agreed that (i) the complexity of multiple impairments, and the multiple disadvantages disabled people face; and (ii) there are differential experience of disability by those who were born with impairments, and those who acquired their impairments through illness, injury, or ageing. v Noted that whilst all the residents experienced the external impact of covid disabled people were more fearful, with the proportion of disabled people who feared catching Covid being significantly higher than the wider population. Therefore, it is not just about the provision of assistance to disabled people, but it is about how agencies engage with those residents’ psychological concerns and make them feel relevant. v Noted that during the coronavirus pandemic, primary care services were forced to work differently and patients to receive care in a limited way, breaking with the traditional, person-to-person interaction. v Acknowledged that Covid-19 created additional barriers for disabled residents who felt an extra burden of social responsibility in protecting themselves and their own health, while the perception was that other residents had not adhered to Covid rules in public places, with scant regard for anyone else at all, let alone those with impairments and underlying health conditions. v Noted that some residents found making sense of the changing rules around Covid harder because of their impairments e.g., disabled residents were regularly confronted with an array of barriers and socially imposed limitations over and above those experienced by non-disabled people. These limitations had sometimes been material, as in the case of physical walls, or spatial, such as the ability to observe social distancing rules or to obtain necessities and this exacerbated mental health issues and distress. v Noted that Covid impacted on disabled residents’ independence, sometimes reducing opportunities for independence, sometimes increasing their dependency (e.g., such as support and care arrangements, shopping, transport, and in numerous other ways). Whilst some of disabled residents had to negotiate new living arrangements as they were no longer being covered by their care providers for specific support needs. Although some disabled residents felt better equipped to cope with adversity because of their prior experiences with socially imposed isolation or that they had an existing support structure such as an emotional support dog trained to regularly provide a ... view the full minutes text for item 2.1 |
|
Improving Care Together: The New Adult Social Care Vision and Strategy PDF 328 KB Additional documents:
Minutes: The received a report that presented the new vision and strategy in adult social care for information and comment. The mains points arising from the questioning arising from discussions on the report maybe summarised as follows:
The Board: v Noted that this report outlines the new vision and strategy in adult social care called “Improving Care Together” which has been developed over summer and autumn 2021 in close partnership with people who use adult social care, carers, staff, and other stakeholders and comprises: v Understood that a vision for the future of adult social care that reflects what staff, providers, users, and carers stated that is important to them e.g., personal goals, connection to others and to be as independent as possible. v Was informed that the aims to meet the vision are the same as the aims of the Tower Hamlets Together partnership and again reflect what they have heard from staff, providers, adult social care users and carers. v Noted that the work packages to meet the aims have been defined through evidence, insights from peers and in feedback from staff, providers, users, and carers. v Noted that the vision and strategy are currently being launched to staff, stakeholders, adult social care users and carers using a range of communication mechanisms. With the aim to have high levels of engagement with the strategy, so that it is well-known and well-understood by all. v Agreed that it has been a very positive piece of work and welcomed the commitment to ensure that the strategy is ‘co-delivered’ with people who use social care and carers and will be looking to establish a new service user and carer group to oversee this in the new year. v Agreed that they would have liked to see a specific mention around discharge given the absolute pressures around hospital beds and patients who are ready to go home not going home. As a result of discussions on the report the Board RESOLVED to note the report and the above-mentioned comments on the new adult social care vision and strategy.
|
|
Additional documents:
Minutes: The Board received a presentation that (i) focused on the updated timeline and ambitions of the NEL ICS changes; and (ii) outlined the potential form and functions options that are available to borough partnerships as part of the wider changes. A summary of the key themes highlighted in the discussions on the presentation is set out below:
The Board:
v Noted that the purpose of this presentation is to give an update on the upcoming changes via the forming of the NEL Integrated Care System (ICS) and the impact of this at a borough level on the Tower Hamlets Together (THT) Partnership. The national timelines have now been extended to 1st July for the formation of the NEL ICS. This is due to the recent winter pressures and the ongoing Covid-19 situation. v Noted that the system has undergone some significant change recently, especially at the CCG and system levels, due to implementation of requirements set out in the NHS Long Term Plan. v Noted that with the introduction of the Integrated Care System (ICS) there is a real opportunity through the ICS arrangements to look at the structure of the decision-making process alongside the THT partnership arrangements. v Noted that working in an integrated way is not new for Tower Hamlets, and the Borough has a strong history of partner agencies working together across the system to provide health and care for patients. Most recently this was very much at the heart of the local response to the Covid pandemic and the rollout of the vaccination programme. Agreed that for Tower Hamlets Together, this means evolving into a Place-based Partnership within the North East London Integrated Care System. v Agreed on the importance in developingstrong leadership; driving the transformation; and implementing the health and well-being strategy. Which requires consideration to be given to looking at (i) a continuation of representation from the GP Federation; (ii) a primary care representative coming from the local clinical leads; (iii) the proposals around Healthwatch; (iv) Borough based partnerships;(v) how to build in the clinical and care professional leadership within the Borough into the partnership arrangements. v Agreed on the importance to make sure that the required infrastructure is in place, to be able to support decisions based on population need, which may or may not be people from a public health background, but that have the relevant expertise to develop the required form and function for an Integrated Care System. v Agreed that as the Integrated Care System will bring together a wide range of partners across a number of different local authority boundaries. That there is a need to reconcile local concerns with the need to consider the wider impact of transformation over the whole healthcare system. v Agreed that effective public scrutiny has a role in helping local providers to reduce inequalities, to improve people’s lives, to improve people’s experiences, to deliver better health and better services and to achieve greater value from the public’s money. Effective public ... view the full minutes text for item 2.3 |
|
Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic Inequalities Commission - Health section progress update PDF 271 KB Additional documents:
Minutes: The Board was reminded that the Tower Hamlets Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic Inequalities Commission health recommendations and action plan was brought to the Health and Wellbeing Board on the 21st of September 2021. Nine of the twenty-three recommendations made by the Commission had related to health and wellbeing and the immediate priorities for delivery had been discussed further at the Board on the 2nd of November (following agreement of recommendations at Cabinet on the 27th of October) The report presented to the Board provided an outline of the progress, plans and areas of challenge for delivery against these recommendation. A summary of the mains points arising from discussions on the presentation has been summarised below:
The Board:
v Noted that the recommendations for Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic groups are interrelated to campaigns, communications, research, codesigned services, digital exclusion, clinical training, hostile environment, partnership, representation. v Noted that at this point, progress links primarily to existing pandemic related work, specifically, pandemic work focussed on Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic communities continues including the multilingual vaccine helpline, Covid Champions and outreach work targeted at Bangladeshi, Somali, Black African Caribbean, and Black African communities. In addition, the research work to understand health inequalities at a deeper level amongst Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic communities and coproduce ways forward has now been commissioned and will complete over the next two months. v Understood that capacity to take forward the communications and campaigns recommendations has been identified through a full-time fixed term post which will focus particularly on recommendations around ensuring communications messages and materials are available and culturally appropriate linking to the research findings as well as the campaigns work. v Having considered the recommendations around digital exclusion facing Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic communities indicate that a more strategic approach is required and agreed that it was important to ensure alignment with the wider measures of the overall digital inclusion plan and that specific equalities considerations needs to be at the heart of the Boroughs Health and Well-Being Strategy to address inequalities in Tower Hamlets and provide a platform to ensure equalities remains at the forefront of the Boards collective work.
In conclusion, the Chair thanked all those attendees for a very positive discussion that had helped to understand health inequalities at a deeper level amongst Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic communities and the specific equalities considerations that will need to be at the heart of the Boroughs Health and Well-Being Strategy.
|
|
Better Care Fund 2021/22 update PDF 238 KB Additional documents:
Minutes: The Board noted that the Better Care Fund (BCF) is currently in its sixth year the aim of the BCF is to deliver better outcomes and secure greater efficiency in health and social care services through increased integration of provision. The mains points arising from the questioning arising from discussions on the presentation is summarised below:
The Board:
v Noted that (i) to receive BCF funding, a local BCF Plan and programme needs to be agreed jointly by the Council and the Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG), endorsed by the Health and Well-Being Board (HWBB) and finally approved by NHS England (NHSE), (ii) the jointly agreed programme then needs to be incorporated into a formal agreement under Section 75 of the NHS Act 2006, (iii) BCF plans set out the local joint vision for, and approach to, integration, including how the activity in the BCF plan will complement the direction set in the NHS Long Term Plan and are also expected to take into account the wider context, including the development of Integrated Care Systems; the requirements of the Care Act, 2014, and wider local government transformation in the area covered by the plan - for example, programmes, such as Integrated Personal Commissioning. v Noted that the Health and Wellbeing Board are required to approve Borough plans and due to the late issuing of guidance and scheduling of Health and Wellbeing Boards this year the Board are requested to retrospectively approve the plan.
As a result of discussions on the report the Board RESOLVED to approve the Better Care Fund Plan for 2021-22.
|
|
ANY OTHER BUSINESS To consider any other business the Chair considers to be urgent.
Additional documents: Minutes: With no other business to discuss the Chair called this meeting to a close and thanked the Members and Officers of the Board for their contributions over the last two years and said that she believed the Board had worked hard to make a difference to the lives of local residents. |