Agenda and draft minutes
Venue: Online 'Virtual' Meeting - https://towerhamlets.public-i.tv/core/portal/home. View directions
Contact: Patricia Attawia, Democratic Services Tel: 0207 364 4883, Email: patricia.attawia@towerhamlets.gov.uk
No. | Item |
---|---|
APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE To receive any apologies for absence. Minutes: There were no apologies for absence from Members already appointed to the Panel.
|
|
DECLARATIONS OF DISCLOSABLE PECUNIARY INTERESTS PDF 215 KB Minutes: There were no declarations of interests.
|
|
UNRESTRICTED REPORTS FOR CONSIDERATION |
|
Freedom of the Borough establishment and membership PDF 257 KB Additional documents: Minutes:
The Chair handed over to Matthew Mannion, Head of Democratic Services, to administratively run the meeting and introduce the report.
Matthew Mannion presented the report on the establishment and membership of the Freedom of the Borough Ad-Hoc Panel 2021/22.
The panel was asked to note the Terms of Reference, Quorum, timetable and Membership.
Co-opted Members The Terms of Reference allow the Panel to consider co-opting additional non-voting Members from outside the Council onto the Panel. The report included options available to the Panel for co-opting new Members.
The panel discussed the process for appointing co-optees, highlighting the importance of cross-party representation and gender balance. A list of potential co-optees drawn up line with the recommendations in the Terms of Reference and consultation with officers and councillors, was presented to the Panel for consideration.
The Panel were in favour of co-opting all those listed. In addition, they asked that the Deputy Lieutenant for Tower Hamlets, Leslie Morgan, be invited to join the Panel.
Nomination Process and Form The Panel were presented with options for the nomination process and nomination form, broken down into three main areas: timetable, process and level of publicity and nomination form. The prestigious nature of the award was emphasised, and the Panel discussed the alternative option of nominations for a Civic Award for unsuccessful applicants.
Timetable The Panel considered the different options for the timetable, taking into account potential Covid restrictions that may still be in place, and the need to try and avoid a virtual ceremony if possible and plan for a full celebration.
They discussed the importance of taking the necessary time to reach all sectors of the community and to give the process the consideration needed for such a prestigious award. The Panel therefore considered it would take several months to conduct the nominations process and so the Award Ceremony should take place in the Autumn.
Process and level of publicity The Panel discussed the need for clarity around what the Freedom of the Borough means, what it is and who should be nominated. It should be emphasised that it is an extremely prestigious award, granted for eminent services to the Borough given over a significant period of time.
Consideration was given to ways of reaching people and raising awareness of the award and the opportunity to nominate. It was highlighted that digital platforms alone would not be enough and other means of publicity should be used such as magazines, newspapers etc.
Members agreed it was important to ensure an open and inclusive process, with awards being representative across communities and gender. it was also considered important to show that it was supported on a cross-party basis.
There was a discussion about the number of awards that should be given out and it was felt that given the exclusive nature of the award the number should not be too high, but as there had only been 1 ceremony in the last 20 years it was felt that subject to nominations the Panel would be ... view the full minutes text for item 3.1 |
|
ANY OTHER UNRESTRICTED BUSINESS CONSIDERED TO BE URGENT Minutes: Nil items.
|