Agenda and draft minutes
Venue: The Council Chamber, Town Hall, Mulberry Place, 5 Clove Crescent, London, E14 2BG
Contact: Simmi Yesmin, Democratic Services Tel: 020 7364 4120, E-mail: simmi.yesmin@towerhamlets.gov.uk
No. | Item |
---|---|
APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE To receive any apologies for absence. Minutes: Apologies for absence were received on behalf of Councillor Peter Golds for whom Councillor Rajib Ahmed substituted for.
|
|
DECLARATIONS OF DISCLOSABLE PECUNIARY INTEREST PDF 56 KB To note any declarations of interest made by Members, including those restricting Members from voting on the questions detailed in Section 106 of the Local Government Finance Act, 1992. See attached note from the Monitoring Officer.
Minutes: There were no declarations of disclosable pecuniary interest.
|
|
To note the rules of procedure which are attached for information. Minutes: The rules of procedure were noted.
|
|
UNRESTRICTED MINUTES PDF 85 KB To confirm as a correct record of the proceedings the unrestricted minutes of the Licensing Sub-Committees held on 26th & 27th November 2013.
Additional documents: Minutes: The minutes of the Licensing Sub Committee meetings held on 26th & 27th November 2013 were agreed and approved as a correct record.
|
|
ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION |
|
Additional documents:
Minutes: At the request of the Chair, Mr Mohshin Ali, Senior Licensing Officer, introduced the report which detailed the application for a new premises licence for The Stables Gallery, Lower Ground Floor, 106 Commercial Street, London E1 6LZ. It was noted that an objections had been received from two local residents, one of whom had since then withdrawn their objection.
At the request of the Chair, Mr Jason Zeloof, Applicant briefly explained the purpose of the licence and highlighted that it would not be used as a bar, it would be to accompany events and exhibitions which would take place at the gallery.
He explained that there would be no off sales and therefore there would be no one drinking on the street. He then referred Members to his proposed conditions which would help promote the licensing objectives.
It was noted that the concern raised by the objector was solely on noise breakout, he stated that there had been a site visit made by Environmental Health Officers who had no objection to the application, he also explained that a store room would be built which would have extra insulation and this was noted in the acoustic report. Mr Zeloof concluded by saying that no responsible authorities had objected to the application and one of the two objectors had withdrawn their objection.
Mr Ali, at this point informed Members that the premises was within the saturation special cumulative impact area, however it was noted that when this application was made the policy was not in effect and therefore does not apply in this application.
The objector was not present at the meeting so therefore Members noted and considered their written objection contained in the agenda.
In response to questions the following was noted;
Members retired to consider their decision at 7.05pm and reconvened at 7.15pm.
The Licensing Objectives
In considering the application, Members were required to consider the same in accordance with the Licensing Act 2003 (as amended), the Licensing Objectives, the Licensing Guidance and the Council’s Statement of Licensing Policy.
Consideration
Each application must be considered on its own merits and after careful consideration the Chair stated that the Sub Committee had carefully listened to the applicant and considered and noted the written representation made by the local resident and decided to grant the applicant with conditions. Members believed that conditions imposed would alleviate the concerns of the local ... view the full minutes text for item 5.1 |
|
Additional documents:
Minutes: At the request of the Chair, Mr Mohshin Ali, Senior Licensing Officer, introduced the report which detailed the application for a new premises licence for Bottle Shop and Tap Room, Arch 251 Paradise Row, London E2 9LE. It was noted that an objection had been received from a local resident, whom was unable to attend the meeting however sent in a written statement for Members to note.
At the request of the Chair, Mr Nigel Owen, Applicant, briefly explained that the premises would be an American tap room and bottle shop selling premium quality beer. He stated that he had 10 years of experience and was interested in the upcoming beer scene.
Members then heard from Mr Jack Speigler, Licensing Representative who asked Members to note that there had been no representation made by the responsible authorities; he explained that the applicants could directly control the external area and monitor any noise nuisance. It was noted that there was an issue with the sound barrier due to Network Rail, as its meters away from the premises, however the Applicant was in conversation with Network Rail about noise issues and insulation.
He stated this premises was new, there was no previous history and they would be occupying a vacant unit and revitalise an old place. He said that management were very responsible and offered conditions to help alleviate the concerns of the local resident.
In response to questions it was noted;
Members retired to consider their decision at 7.40pm and reconvened at 7.50pm.
The Licensing Objectives
In considering the application, Members were required to consider the same in accordance with the Licensing Act 2003 (as amended), the Licensing Objectives, the Licensing Guidance and the Council’s Statement of Licensing Policy.
Consideration
Each application must be considered on its own merits and after careful consideration the Chair stated that the Sub Committee had decided to grant the licence and add conditions in order to address the concerns raised in relation to the licensing objectives of “the prevention of public nuisance” and ‘the prevention of crime and disorder’.
The Sub Committee noted both comments and representations from the applicant and noted and considered the written representation from the objector. Members did not think it was appropriate or proportionate to reject the application as Members felt that a condition to restrict patrons from taking open drinks outside the premise after 22:00 hours would reduce the noise nuisance that would occur if patrons were to drink outside later into the night. This would help address the concerns raised by the objector and allow the applicant to also trade to later hours.
Members also advised the applicant to consider placing a shelter ... view the full minutes text for item 5.2 |
|
Additional documents: Minutes: At the request of the Chair, Mr Mohshin Ali, Senior Licensing Officer, introduced the report which detailed the application for a new premises licence for The Holborn Workshop, 493 Hackney Road, London E2 9ED. It was noted that an objection had been received from a local resident.
At the request of the Chair, Mr Morgan Hamilton-Griffin explained that this was a café, shop and deli. There would be an off licence service, packaged as gifts to takeaway. There would be premium alcohol sold as an ancillary to the products sold at the cafe.
He further explained that there would be drink tasting events, the premises had a capacity for 40 people, it was located on Hackney Road which was a very busy road, he explained that he had tried to contact the objector but had no luck he then referred Members to the conditions proposed on page 210 of the agenda.
In response to questions it was noted that there would be no dancing at the premises, the off sale of alcohol would packaged as gifts and containers would not be opened at the premises, there would be no amplified music
Members retired to consider their decision at 8pm and reconvened at 8.15pm.
The Licensing Objectives
In considering the application, Members were required to consider the same in accordance with the Licensing Act 2003 (as amended), the Licensing Objectives, the Licensing Guidance and the Council’s Statement of Licensing Policy.
Consideration
Each application must be considered on its own merits and after careful consideration the Chair stated that the Sub Committee had decided to grant the licence in part and add conditions in order to address the concerns raised in relation to the licensing objectives of “the prevention of public nuisance” and “the prevention of crime and disorder”.
Decision
Accordingly, the Sub-Committee unanimously –
RESOLVED
That the application for a New Premises Licence for, The Holborn Workshop, 493 Hackney Road, London E2 9EDbe GRANTED in part, with conditions.
Sale of Alcohol (on and off sale)
Sunday to Thursday from 08:00hrs to 20:45hrs Friday to Saturday from 08:00hrs to 22:45hrs
The Provision of Regulated Entertainment in the form of live music (indoors):
Saturday from 19:00hrs to 22:00hrs
Hours premises is open to the public:
Sunday to Thursday from 08:00hrs to 21:00hrs Friday to Saturday from 08:00hrs to 23:00hrs
Condition
|
|
ANY OTHER BUSINESS THAT THE CHAIR CONSIDERS URGENT PDF 64 KB Application for a Temporary Event Notice for Bar Solento, 3 Clove Crescent, London E14 2BB
Additional documents: Minutes: Mr Michael McCabe, stated that he had been to the premises on occasions. However, had not discussed this application prior to the hearing.
At the request of the Chair, Mr Mohshin Ali, Senior Licensing Officer, introduced the report which detailed the application for a Temporary Event Notice for Bar Salento, 3 Clove Crescent, London E14 2BB. It was noted that an objection had been received from the Police.
At the request of the Chair, Mr Dean Tindall, Security Management explained that he had been employed by the Applicant Mr Roberto Plati to take care and manage the security at the premises, he explained that there were security plans in place with, signing in procedures, monitoring numbers in and out of the premise, etc.
Members then heard from Mr Plati who explained that the TEN application was for a New Years Eve party for three family groups for a dinner and dance.
At the request of the Chair, PC Mark Perry, Metropolitan Police explained that having spoken to Mr Ian Wareing, Environmental Health about extending hours, Mr Plati was advised to do a risk assessment 3 weeks in advance of an event which had not been done. He then referred to his statement and detailed an incident which took place outside the premises, he highlighted that the premises was open outside its trading hours, there were 30 people taking part in a fight and a flick knife was found on the floor after the crowd had dispersed. He then mentioned that the Mr Plati showed little remorse when the Police Officers went to visit the premises the next day.
PC Perry then concluded that they should reduce the time to 02:00 hours as 04:00 hours was too excessive and have no external DJ playing at the party as it could lead to a promoted DJ event.
In response to questions from Members it was noted;
That there had been 4/5 other TEN applications and there had been no complaints That a family member would be playing the music via a lap top and there would be no external DJ playing at the premises. That it was for a New Years Eve party for 3 families and their friends That there would be a ticket entry system so no one could just walk in from the street That they wanted a 4am licence as they now have security measures in place to deal with any issues That there would be a dispersal policy in place to help minimise the disruption when people would be leaving. That the venue capacity was 160 people
PC Mark Perry questioned why a ticket entry system would be required if it was for a private family event.
Members retired to consider their decision at 8.45pm and reconvened at 9.00pm.
The Licensing Objectives
In considering the application, Members were required to consider the same in accordance with the Licensing Act 2003 (as amended), the Licensing Objectives, the Licensing Guidance and the Council’s Statement of ... view the full minutes text for item 6. |