Agenda, decisions and minutes
Venue: Committee Room C3, Town Hall, Mulberry Place, 5 Clove Crescent, London, E14 2BG
Contact: Simmi Yesmin, Senior Democratic Services Officer Tel: 020 7364 4120, E-mail: simmi.yesmin@towerhamlets.gov.uk
No. | Item | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DECLARATIONS OF DISCLOSABLE PECUNIARY INTEREST PDF 117 KB To note any declarations of interest made by Members, including those restricting Members from voting on the questions detailed in Section 106 of the Local Government Finance Act, 1992. See attached note from the Monitoring Officer.
Minutes: There were no declarations of interests made.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
To note the rules of procedure which are attached for information. Additional documents: Minutes: The rules of procedure were noted.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Application for a New Premises Licence for Hotel, 419 - 437 Hackney Road, London E2 8PP PDF 440 KB Additional documents:
Minutes: At the request of the Chair, Ms Kathy Driver, Licensing Officer, introduced the report which detailed the application for a new premises licence for Mama Shelter Hotel, 419-437 Hackney Road, London E2 8PP. It was noted that objections had been received on behalf of local residents. It was further noted that since the publication of the agenda, the Licensing Authority had withdrawn their objection to the application.
At the request of the Chair, Mr Philip Kolvin QC, representative on behalf of the Applicant, explained that the hotel was a part of a chain of boutique hotels worldwide and would be the first of its kind to open in the UK. Mr Kolvin stated that following consultation, all Responsible Authorities had withdrawn their objections and were satisfied with the hours and conditions offered and agreed.
It was noted that the 10 local resident objections had been made to the original application which was for a 24 hour operation. The hours of operation had now been reduced . Mr Kolvin gave a brief background history of Mr Jamie Kerr, the manager of the hotel. It was noted that it was vital for the hotel to ensure that they were good neighbours to local residents. If there were any issues, there are powers of enforcement that could be taken. It was noted that the premises was not a night club or pub but an exclusive and premium hotel with a restaurant which would be open to the public. He explained that the revenue for the hotel was primarily from customers using the hotel to sleep and therefore any noise disturbance would be contrary to its interests. It was further noted that the inside courtyard would have a glass enclosure fitted to prevent any noise leakage.
Mr Kolvin then went on to highlight the following:
The Acoustic Assessment report from Vanguardia and the Licensing Report from Mr Adrien Studd, Independent Licensing Consultant, were noted.
Mr Kolvin stated that the hotel seeks to attract families and tourists. The premises was not in the Cumulative Impact Zone and other venues in close proximity had longer licensing hours. He explained that objections were initially for a 24 hours licence however this had since been reduced. Management would be looking to enhance relations with residents and a number for the manager would be available so that he can be contacted directly. The directors had provided the manager with all necessary powers to enable him to effectively deal with any issues that may arise.
Members also heard from local residents Mr Daniel Bland, ... view the full minutes text for item 3.1 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional documents:
Minutes: At the request of the Chair, Ms Kathy Driver, Licensing Officer, introduced the report which detailed the application for a new premises licence for Lean Kitchen, Railway Arch 4, Gales Gardens, London E2 0EJ. It was noted that objections had been received on behalf of local residents.
At the request of the Chair, Mr Dino Constantinou, Representative on behalf of Applicant, explained that the premises was situated under the railway arch and was part of 10-15 kitchen units. It provided a delivery service of food and beverages over a 2 mile radius. He explained that they were not currently selling alcohol from the premises.
Mr Constantinou explained that the train lines run until 1am and deliveries were mainly made by bicycles and mopeds. It was noted that the Applicant had put in a petition which led to the introduction of a 5mph speed limit in the area. It was noted that the residential houses/flats have their kitchens and bathrooms facing the archway to minimise the noise disturbance from the trains.
It was noted there was no consumption of food and drink on the premises. The Applicant had met with the Responsible Authorities and had agreed conditions. They tried to communicate with the resident objectors but none had responded. Mr Constantinou explained that they had installed CCTV inside and outside the premises, implemented a driver’s code of conduct, introduced an internal waiting/lobby area for delivery drivers, set up a designated parking area, displayed additional signage and published a feedback email address for residents to raise with management any concerns they may have. Mr Constantinou stated that they would report abusive drivers to Uber Eats and have CCTV to deter such behaviour. It was noted that the hours applied for were within the Council’s framework hours.
It was noted that the objectors were not present at the meeting, therefore the Sub Committee noted and considered the written objections contained in the agenda.
In response to Members’ questions, the following was noted:
- There were two members of staff during the lunch period and four members of staff during busy periods. - They were awaiting a Health & Safety rating from the Council. - The unit was close to residential buildings but there was a fence in the middle creating a separation. - The Overground trains above the railway arch pass by approximately every 7 minutes. - A 5mph speed limit had been recently introduced as a direct result of the Applicant’s petition. - They could ask UberEats for a particular driver not to be used if the driver was found to be abusive or in breach of their code of conduct. - They have not received any reports of bad behaviour by their drivers. - In order to prevent noise, cowls had been fitted at the premises. - They receive approximately 30-40 orders per day. - It was difficult for members of the public to link a driver to a particular kitchen unit. - A driver waiting area had been introduced in the ... view the full minutes text for item 3.2 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EXTENSION OF DECISION DEADLINE: LICENSING ACT 2003 The Sub Committee may be requested to extend the decision deadline for applications to be considered at forthcoming meetings due to the volume of applications requiring a hearing. Where necessary, details will be provided at the meeting.
Minutes: The Chair agreed to extend the decision deadlines for the following applications;
|