Agenda, decisions and draft minutes
Venue: Council Chamber, 1st Floor, Town Hall, Mulberry Place, 5 Clove Crescent, London, E14 2BG
Contact: Zoe Folley, Democratic Services Tel: 020 7364 4877, E-mail: zoe.folley@towerhamlets.gov.uk
Note | No. | Item |
---|---|---|
DECLARATIONS OF DISCLOSABLE PECUNIARY INTERESTS PDF 56 KB To note any declarations of interest made by Members, including those restricting Members from voting on the questions detailed in Section 106 of the Local Government Finance Act, 1992. See attached note from the Monitoring Officer.
Minutes: No declarations of disclosable pecuniary interests were made.
Councillors Helal Abbas, Rajib Ahmed and Khales Uddin Ahmed declared an interest in agenda item 6.2, 100 Whitechapel road and land rear at Fieldgate Street & Vine Court (PA/13/3049). This was on the basis that the Councillors had received correspondence from interested parties in relation to the application.
Councillor Kabir Ahmed declared an interest in agenda item 6.2, 100 Whitechapel road and land rear at Fieldgate Street & Vine Court (PA/13/3049). This was on the basis that the Councillor was a Board Member of Tower Hamlets Community Housing.
Councillor Zara Davis declared an interest in agenda item 6.3 Heron Quays West, Heron Quay, London, E14 (PA/13/3159). This was on the basis that the Councillor had received hospitality from an interested party.
Councillor Md. Maium Miah declared an interest in agenda items 6.1 Suttons Wharf North, Palmers Road, London (PA/13/02938) and 6.3 Heron Quays West, Heron Quay, London, E14 (PA/13/3159). This was on the basis that the Councillor was a Board Member for the One Housing Group in respect of item 6.1 and had received hospitality from an interested party in respect of item 6.3.
|
||
MINUTES OF THE PREVIOUS MEETING(S) PDF 78 KB To confirm as a correct record the minutes of the meeting of the Strategic Development Committee held on 25th February 2014 and the extraordinary meeting of the Strategic Development Committee held on 13th March 2014.
Additional documents: Minutes: The Committee RESOLVED
That the minutes of the meeting of the Strategic Development Committee held on 25th February 2014 and the extraordinary meeting of the Strategic Development Committee held on 13th March 2014 be agreed as a correct record and signed by the Chair.
|
||
RECOMMENDATIONS To RESOLVE that:
1) in the event of changes being made to recommendations by the Committee, the task of formalising the wording of those changes is delegated to the Corporate Director Development and Renewal along the broad lines indicated at the meeting; and
2) in the event of any changes being needed to the wording of the Committee’s decision (such as to delete, vary or add conditions/informatives/planning obligations or reasons for approval/refusal) prior to the decision being issued, the Corporate Director Development and Renewal is delegated authority to do so, provided always that the Corporate Director does not exceed the substantive nature of the Committee’s decision.
Minutes: The Committee RESOLVED that:
1) In the event of changes being made to recommendations by the Committee, the task of formalising the wording of those changes is delegated to the Corporate Director, Development and Renewal along the broad lines indicated at the meeting; and
2) In the event of any changes being needed to the wording of the Committee’s decision (such as to delete, vary or add conditions/informatives/planning obligations or reasons for approval/refusal) prior to the decision being issued, the Corporate Director, Development and Renewal is delegated authority to do so, provided always that the Corporate Director does not exceed the substantive nature of the Committee’s decision
|
||
PROCEDURE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS PDF 64 KB To NOTE the procedure for hearing objections at meetings of the Strategic Development Committee.
Minutes: The Committee noted the procedure for hearing objections, together with details of persons who had registered to speak at the meeting.
|
||
DEFERRED ITEMS Nil items. Minutes: Nil items. |
||
GRANT |
Suttons Wharf North, Palmers Road, London (PA/13/02938) PDF 1 MB Proposal:
Application under s.73 of the Town and Country Planning Act for a variation of Condition 22 of the Planning Permission PA/11/3348 dated 30/03/12 to seek minor material amendments to the approved Block A of the Suttons Wharf North development comprising:
· Removal of one ground floor links between Block A2 and A3 and the creation of separate D1 Use Class units (390sq.m; 280sq.m; and 1035sq.m); · Insertion of an additional internal floor level (no resulting increase of heights to the consented buildings); · Alterations to the dwelling mix within Block A, resulting in a net increase of 41 residential units · Other associated external changes
Recommendation: To GRANT planning permission subject the variation to the legal agreement to secure additional planning obligations, conditions and informative(s). Minutes: Update Report tabled.
Jerry Bell (Applications Manager, Development and Renewal) introduced the application for a variation of the Planning Permission to seek minor material amendments to the approved Block A of the Suttons Wharf North development.
The Chair then invited registered speakers to address the Committee.
Dr Stephen Goldup spoke in objection to the proposal. He objected to the proposed increase in density of the development. The proposal exhibited signs of overdevelopment and would worsen anti social behaviour. The figures regarding density were inaccurate. He also questioned the impact on the proposed health care facility on site from the plans that was supposed to mitigate the increase in population. The survey of doctor covering the area was inaccurate. Some were not accepting new patients. The proposal would remove all retail space in Block A. However, this had not given proper consideration.
Iain Rhind and Justine Elcombe (Applicant’s Agents) spoke in support of the scheme (dividing the allocated three minutes). The speakers explained the nature of the amendment. The changes were minor in nature and there was adequate infrastructure to support the scheme (public transport, health facilities). The new units would be car free. The proposed health care facility would be re-provided in accordance with the NHS requirements. The population density figures were based on survey data.
There would only be a small increase in child yield. The affordable housing across the scheme exceeded policy. The applicant had increased the s106 to reflect the variation. In summary, the applicant had listened to the Committee views on the scheme. It was recommended that the scheme is approved. In response to the Committee, it was explained that the NHS were satisfied with the plans regarding the health facility with responsibility for the lease of the unit.
Jane Jin (Planning Officer Development and Renewal) presented the report and the update. She explained the nature of the plans relating to Block A, including the changes to the internal layout, the amenity space and the revised housing mixed (taking into account the recent changes to the scheme). Overall, the percentage of affordable housing across the entire scheme continued to be acceptable totalling 45%. Members were also advised of the plans to rationalise the D1 use with the largest space reserved for NHS use in accordance with their requirements. The Committee were also informed of the planning obligations. Officers were recommending that the planning permission be granted.
In response, Members stressed the need for some type of barrier or landscaping around the canal side walkway for safety reasons. Officers agreed to explore this further and to secure a suitable barrier as part of the conditions with the Canal and River Trust and will review previous details secured through a planning condition.
In response to questions, it was confirmed that the units complied with the relevant standards. There would be sufficient car parking around the site to accommodate the need for the doctors surgery.
Officers also clarified that the percentage of affordable housing already secured at an ... view the full minutes text for item 6.1 |
|
REFUSE |
100 Whitechapel road and land rear at Fieldgate Street & Vine Court (PA/13/3049) PDF 1 MB Proposal: Demolition of existing vehicle workshop and car showroom; erection of a residential development comprising a total of 223 dwellings (comprising 48 studios; 91 x 1 bed; 52 x 2 bed; 20 x 3 bed; 11 x 4 bed) in an 18 storey building facing Fieldgate Street; and 2 buildings ranging in height from 8-12 storey building facing Whitechapel Road and Vine Court, provision of ground floor retail and restaurant spaces (Class A1 and A3), 274.9 sqm extension to the prayer hall at the East London Mosque and provision of pedestrian link between Fieldgate Street and Whitechapel Road, extension to existing basement to provide 20 disabled car parking spaces, motorcycle spaces, 360 bicycle parking spaces and bin storage in basement, associated landscape and public realm works.
Recommendation: That subject to any direction by the London Mayor, Planning Permission is REFUSED for the reasons set out in the Committee report. Minutes:
Update Report tabled.
Jerry Bell (Applications Manager, Development and Renewal) introduced the application at 100 Whitechapel road and land rear at Fieldgate Street & Vine Court for a mixed used development.
The Chair then invited registered speakers to address the Committee.
Mr Mohammed Zabadne spoke in support of the application as the applicant. (Note: With the agreement of the Chair, Mr Zabadne addressed the Committee for six minutes (having been given an additional three minutes in view of language and hearing difficulties). He described the benefits of the scheme including high quality housing and improvements to the Mosque. He highlighted the strength of the local support and that there had been very few objections. The Greater London Authority considered that the scheme was acceptable in principle and complied with the London Plan. The plans also complied with the Council’s planning policy for the area. The Council had approved similar developments in the area. The density and affordable housing offer was acceptable.
Mr Zabadne addressed each reason for refusal, drawing attention to the resubmitted information. He challenged the evidence supporting the suggested reasons and considered that the concerns could be dealt with by condition. In response to the Committee, he confirmed that Tower Hamlets Community Housing were supportive of the scheme given the level of new affordable.
Councillor Shahed Ali spoke in support of the scheme as a local ward Councillor. He considered that the plans would be in keeping with the area given it was mixed in nature. The current use was an eyesore. The scheme would improve the permeability of the site, provide local jobs, 29% affordable housing, much needed family housing and public realm improvements. The housing mix and amenity impacts were not unusual for a development in this area. Councillor Ali highlighted the plans for the Mosque to support inclusive community events.
In response to questions, Councillor Ali further explained the benefits of the scheme to the local area. The scheme would generate local employment, vastly regenerate the site and encourage business. He noted the issues around the child play space. However, he considered that the offer should be sufficient given the expected child yield and the amount of play space and facilities nearby. Not all approved schemes met the requirements in this regard.
Councillor Abdul Asad also spoke in support of the application as the local ward Councillor. He also highlighted the potential benefits of the scheme to the local area and that aspects accorded with the visions of the Council’s area Masterplan. The applicant had played an active role in transforming the local community and supporting community projects. They were committed to serving the local community. He also welcomed the plans for the Mosque highlighting their work in the community. These proposal would facilitate such work. Councillor Asad recommended the application for approval.
Paul Buckenham (Development Manager, Development and Renewal) presented the application. Firstly he drew attention to the tabled update report which amongst other matters, reported the removal of the concerns about ... view the full minutes text for item 6.2 |
|
Heron Quays West, Heron Quay, London, E14 (PA/13/3159) PDF 1 MB Proposal: Outline planning application (all matters reserved) for the demolition of existing buildings and structures and erection of a new building with a maximum height of 191.5 metres AOD comprising a maximum of 129,857 square metres GIA of office floor space (Use Class B1) and a maximum of 785 square metres GIA of flexible floor space (Use Class A1, A2, A3, A4 and A5) along with a decked promenade to the South Dock, access and highways works, landscaping and other associated works.
Recommendation: To GRANT planning permission subject to any direction by the London Mayor, prior completion of a legal agreement, conditions and informative(s). Minutes: Update Report tabled.
Councillor Md. Maium Miah left the meeting before the consideration of this item.
Jerry Bell (Applications Manager, Development and Renewal) introduced the application at Heron Quays West, Heron Quay, London, for outline planning permission for the demolition of existing building and the construction of a new office lead development.
Katie Cooke (Planning Officer, Development and Renewal) presented the report and the update. Ms Cooke explained the key features of the proposal including the site and surrounds, the planning history, the outcome of the local consultation, the height, floor plans and the controls documents to secure a high quality building at reserved matters stage including the detailed design. She highlighted the successful plans to relocate existing on site occupants near the site.
It was also reported that the impact on amenity was acceptable and the Council’s Highway Services and Transport for London had no concerns with the scheme subject to the mitigation.
Members also noted the proposed contributions (the s106 agreement and the Community Infrastructure Levy) pending finalisation when the final details of the scheme were known. The Council’s Planning Contributions Panel were supportive of this approach. The application accorded with policy and was recommended for approval.
In response to Members, it was confirmed that Officers had met with National Grid to confirm that there were no hazardous installations near the site. Their comments in the report about this were generic. Officers also clarified the status of the listed dock.
Details of the contributions for the Borough were set out in the report.
On a vote of 6 in favour 1 against, and 1 abstention, the Committee RESOLVED:
1. That outline planning permission (all matters reserved) at Heron Quays West, Heron Quay, London, E14 (PA/13/3159) be GRANTED for the demolition of existing buildings and structures and erection of a new building with a maximum height of 191.5 metres AOD comprising a maximum of 129,857 square metres GIA of office floor space (Use Class B1) and a maximum of 785 square metres GIA of flexible floor space (Use Class A1, A2, A3, A4 and A5) along with a decked promenade to the South Dock, access and highways works, landscaping and other associated works SUBJECT to
2. Any direction by the Mayor
3. The prior completion of a legal agreement to secure the planning obligations set out in the Committee report.
4. That the Corporate Director Development & Renewal is delegated power to negotiate the legal agreement indicated above acting within normal delegated authority.
5. That the Corporate Director Development & Renewal is delegated authority to recommend conditions and informatives on the planning permission to secure the matters set out in the Committee report.
|
||