Members are reminded to consider the categories of interest in the Code of Conduct for Members to determine whether they have an interest in any agenda item and any action they should take. For further details, please see the attached note from the Monitoring Officer.

Members are reminded to declare the nature of the interest and the agenda item it relates to. Please note that ultimately it’s the Members’ responsibility to declare any interests form and to update their register of interest form as required by the Code.

If in doubt as to the nature of your interest, you are advised to seek advice prior to the meeting by contacting the Monitoring Officer or Democratic Services

Further Advice contact: Linda Walker, Interim Director of Legal and Monitoring Officer, Tel: 0207 364 4348

There were no declarations of pecuniary interests, however all Members were contacted by residents via emails all calls in regards to all applications.

To confirm as a correct record the minutes of the meeting of the Strategic Development Committee held on 28 August 2024.

The Committee RESOLVED that:

The minutes of the Committee meeting held on 28 August 2024 were approved and signed as a correct record of proceedings.

To RESOLVE that:

1)   in the event of changes being made to recommendations by the Committee, the task of formalising the wording of those changes is delegated to the Corporate Director Housing and Regeneration along the broad lines indicated at the meeting; and

2)   in the event of any changes being needed to the wording of the Committee’s decision (such as to delete, vary or add conditions/informatives/planning obligations or reasons for approval/refusal) prior to the decision being issued, the Corporate Director Housing and Regeneration is delegated authority to do so, provided always that the Corporate Director does not exceed the substantive nature of the Committee’s decision.

3)    To NOTE the procedure for hearing objections at meetings of the Strategic Development Committee.

The Committee RESOLVED that:

1.    In the event of changes being made to recommendations by the

Committee, the task of formalising the wording of those changes is

delegated to the Corporate Director Housing and Regeneration along the broad lines indicated at the meeting; and

2.    In the event of any changes being needed to the wording of the Committee’s decision (such as to delete, vary or add conditions/informatives/planning obligations or reasons for approval/refusal) prior to the decision being issued, the Corporate Director Housing and Regeneration is delegated authority to do so, provided always that the Corporate Director does not exceed the substantive nature of the Committee’s decision.

3.    To note the procedure for hearing objections at meetings for the Strategic Development Committee.

Paul Buckenham introduced the application to grant planning permission for the demolition of the existing building and erection of a mixed-use residential led building containing 450 residential units (Class C3) and new podium level to accommodate flexible retail, community, creative, and amenity uses (Class E and F2) as well as basement level blue-badge parking, new public realm and landscaping, and all associated works.

Jane Jin  provided a presentation to accompany the application. And reminded the Committee of the scheme, which proposes 450 residential units with 120 affordable housing units, which equates to 35% affordable housing by habitable rooms.

It was noted that this application for planning permission was considered by the Strategic Development Committee on 16 July 2024. The application was deferred for a site visit, so that Members could better understand the likely construction impacts arising from the proposed development. The site visit was held on 22 August 2024.

Only Members physically present at the 28 August meeting were permitted to vote on this application.

Further to the presentation, the Committee asked questions to Officers regarding the following issues;

·       Confirmed that the applicant will not alter the scheme which is compliant with the current local plan in terms of the number of dwelling mix within the scheme and Officers are satisfied with the current proposal.

·       Clarified that the development will take approximately five years to complete.

·       Explained that it is not possible to alter the impact of the development with a request for more family-sized units, as these have already been addressed by conditions indicated in the application.

Following the questions, Officers assured the Committee that conditions are in place

On a unanimous vote of 8 in favour, 0 against and 0 abstentions the Committee RESOLVED:

1.    That planning permission be GRANTED for the proposed development at 4 & 5 Harbour Exchange Square, London E14 9TQ

2.    Subject to planning conditions and obligations listed in the report.

3.    The outcome of the Stage 2 referral to the Mayor of London.

Councillor Saied Ahmed and Councillor Kamrul Hussain recused themselves from item 4.2 and Councillor Ahmodur Khan and Councillor Suluk Ahmed were replaced as substitutes. They both introduced themselves and  had no disclosable pecuniary interests to declare. Councillor Sabina Khan also recused herself, as she was virtually present for the meeting on 28 August when this application was initially submitted and is unable to vote. Councillor Mufeedah Bustin introduced herself for this item, as she was physically present at the 28 August meeting. She had no disclosable pecuniary interests to declare.

Update report noted.

Paul Buckenham introduced the application to grant planning permission with obligations for the redevelopment of site involving erection of five buildings and retention of one building for provision of up to 69,033 sqm (GIA) of Class E(g) space for flexible life science purpose uses; and provision of up to 6,363 sqm (GIA) flexible Class E supporting uses and Class F1 and Class F2 supporting uses (gallery/ exhibition/ community uses); up to 2,820 sqm (GIA) F1(a) for research and development and teaching activities in the  life science sector; with associated landscaping; public realm and highway works; re-provision of existing on-street car parking; and erection of a single pavilion building comprising up to 759 sqm (GIA) Class E(b) café use with ancillary storage, and Sui Generis use (public toilets) set within a new landscaped open square.

The development is to involve erection of a building up to 4 storeys on Plot A (including top storey plant); and erection of two buildings (on Plots B1 and B3) of 4 storeys rising to 8 storeys respectively (the latter including top storey

plant) including the demolition of former Outpatient's Building Annexe and part demolition/part retention of main former Outpatient's Building; and on Plot B2 the retention of the Ambrose King building. The development is to also involve the erection of a 7 storey building (including top storey plant) on Plot C (45.9m AOD); and erection of 15 storey building (including 2 top storeys of plant) on Plot D1 (78.7m AOD).

Gareth Gwynne provided a presentation to accompany the application. Members noted at the last committee a desire to understand the public benefits of the scheme and expressed concerns around those, including the level of apprenticeships. The applicant has now secured an end phase apprenticeships, which was a previously proposed.

It was noted that this application was initially considered by the Strategic Development Committee on 28 August 2024. The application was deferred for a site visit, which took place on 24 September 2024.

Shahi Mofozil, Senior Manager, Business Growth, Growth & Economic Development Division, outlined the component mix between wet and dry lab spaces, which is currently in high demand. It was noted that the scheme has been secured as a rounded mix of affordable workspace, which is in line with or exceeds the discounted rent levels in the Local Plan. The fit out requirements and available space provision. It also provides benefits to local businesses and residents.

The office space proposed will offer  ...  view the full minutes text for item 4.2

Councillor Ahmodur Khan and Councillor Suluk Ahmed both left the meeting. Councillor Sabina Khan reintroduced herself to the Committee, as did Councillor Kamrul Hussain. Councillor Kabir Hussain then introduced himself. None of the Councillors had any disclosable pecuniary interests to declare, however, Councillor Kamrul Hussain declared he received emails from residents in regards to the application.

Paul Buckenham introduced the application to grant permission for minor material amendments to planning permission Ref: PA/21/00288, Dated 14/07/2022: Amendment(s) sought: Amendment to the wording of Condition 22 – Operational Requirements.

Aleksandra Milentijevic  provided a presentation to accompany the application, which highlighted the proposal’s site and surroundings. Details on the consented jetty structure were noted and Members were informed that the proposed changes include a variation of the Section 73 condition, the operating requirements for the Jetty noted in Condition 22. The Committee heard that no changes have been proposed to the physical extent of the structure.

Ms Milentijevic then presented an overview of the consented wording of Condition 22, which indicated the operating hours for Uber boats, the movements of the Thames Clipper and the engine capacity for all vessels approaching and leaving the jetty.

The Committee was informed of the proposed wording of Condition 22, which indicated the average engine emissions at full power, the vessels' annual average daily traffic, and the maximum hourly boat movements from 23:00hrs and 06.00 hours. Details of the public consultation were included, including the press release, site notice, and 483 letters sent to neighbouring properties.

The Committee heard that 293 representations were received, with 196 in objection and 97 in support. Since the release of the report 9 additional representations were received. The consultation related to the existing issues in the area, the general planning matters in regards to the procedure of Section 73, comments on assessments undertaken, the air quality, noise levels, amenity and safety concerns, ecology, transport and heritage issues. The objections raised related to the impact on ecology and increased foot traffic.

Ms Milentijevic informed the Committee that the applicant submitted an additional air quality assessment, which included the change in pollutant concentration of less than 1%. A pollutant dispersion assessment was also conducted, to examine the consented versus proposed emissions changes, A Carbon Strategy condition has been applied to the application to determine if carbon neutral energy is feasible for vehicles in the future.

Noise assessment and noise modelling was undertaken, the latter tests the number of  hourly vehicle movements taking place at the jetty and showed that up to 70 vehicle movements could potentially take place without causing significant adverse effects to neighbouring properties.

Regarding amenity concerns related to the types of boats the jetty would accommodate; an additional condition has now been placed to prohibited private boat hire from stopping or departing at the jetty and restricted access via lockable gates will be in place. To summarise, Ms Milentijevic recommended minor material amendments to planning permission be granted.

The Chair invited Keith MacLean, representing residents of New Providence Wharf, to  ...  view the full minutes text for item 5.1