Members are reminded to consider the categories of interest in the Code of Conduct for Members to determine whether they have an interest in any agenda item and any action they should take. For further details, please see the attached note from the Monitoring Officer.

Members are reminded to declare the nature of the interest and the agenda item it relates to. Please note that ultimately it’s the Members’ responsibility to declare any interests form and to update their register of interest form as required by the Code.

If in doubt as to the nature of your interest, you are advised to seek advice prior to the meeting by contacting the Monitoring Officer or Democratic Services

Councillor Sabina Akhtar declared a non DPI interest in the following agenda items due to association with a registered speaker, Councillor Ehtasham Haque

6.1 2 Trafalgar Way, London E14 5SP (PF/19/00127)

6.2 Blackwall Yard (PF/19/00112)

To confirm as a correct record the minutes of the meeting of the Strategic Development Committee held on  21 May 2020

RESOLVED:

That the minutes of the meeting of the Strategic Development Committee held on 21^h May 2020 be agreed as a correct record

To RESOLVE that:

1)   in the event of changes being made to recommendations by the Committee, the task of formalising the wording of those changes is delegated to the Corporate Director Place along the broad lines indicated at the meeting; and

2)   in the event of any changes being needed to the wording of the Committee’s decision (such as to delete, vary or add conditions/informatives/planning obligations or reasons for approval/refusal) prior to the decision being issued, the Corporate Director Place is delegated authority to do so, provided always that the Corporate Director does not exceed the substantive nature of the Committee’s decision.

3)    To NOTE the procedure for hearing objections at meetings of the Strategic Development Committee.

To RESOLVE that:

1)   in the event of changes being made to recommendations by the Committee, the task of formalising the wording of those changes is delegated to the Corporate Director Place along the broad lines indicated at the meeting; and

2)   in the event of any changes being needed to the wording of the Committee’s decision (such as to delete, vary or add conditions/informatives/planning obligations or reasons for approval/refusal) prior to the decision being issued, the Corporate Director Place is delegated authority to do so, provided always that the Corporate Director does not exceed the substantive nature of the Committee’s decision.

3)   To NOTE the procedure for hearing objections at meetings of the Strategic Development Committee.

There are none

There were none.

There are none

Proposal:

Redevelopment of the site to provide educational, commercial  incubator space and  up to 1,643  student rooms for UCL and up to 76 ‘key worker’ flats for employees of the university, in three towers of 24, 34 and 49 storeys

            Recommendation:

            The Committee notes the contents of the report and pre-application presentation.

            The Committee identifies any other planning and design issues or material considerations that the developer should take into account at the pre-application stage, prior to submitting a planning application.

The Committee considered the presentation in accordation with the pre -application prototical.

RESOLVED:

The Committee noted the contents of the report and pre-application presentation

Proposal:

Residential led mixed use redevelopment of the site and enhancement of Grade II listed dock to provide approx. 900 new residential units, commercial floor space and a 2FE primary school across a series of buildings ranging between 4 and 38 storeys.

Recommendation:

The Committee notes the contents of the report and pre-application presentation.

The Committee identifies any other planning and design issues or material considerations that the developer should take into account at the pre-application stage, prior to submitting a planning application.

The Committee considered the presentation in accordation with the pre -application prototical.

RESOLVED:

The Committee noted the contents of the report and pre-application presentation