Agenda, decisions and draft minutes
Venue: Council Chamber, 1st Floor, Town Hall, Mulberry Place, 5 Clove Crescent, London, E14 2BG
Contact: Zoe Folley, Democratic Services Tel: 020 7364 0842, E-mail: zoe.folley@towerhamlets.gov.uk
No. | Item | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE To receive any apologies for absence. Decision: Apologies for absence were submitted on behalf of Councillors Bill Turner and Judith Gardiner.
Minutes: Apologies for absence were submitted on behalf of Councillors Bill Turner and Judith Gardiner.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST PDF 46 KB To note any declarations of interest made by Members, including those restricting Members from voting on the questions detailed in Section 106 of the Local Government Finance Act, 1992. See attached note from the Chief Executive.
Decision: Members declared interests in items on the agenda for the meeting as set out below:-
Minutes: Members declared interests in items on the agenda for the meeting as set out below:-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
UNRESTRICTED MINUTES PDF 83 KB To confirm as a correct record of the proceedings the unrestricted minutes of the ordinary meeting of the Strategic Development Committee held on 27th October 2011. Decision: The Committee RESOLVED
That the unrestricted minutes of the meeting of the Committee held on 27th October 2011 be agreed as a correct record and signed by the Chair.
Minutes: The Committee RESOLVED
That the unrestricted minutes of the meeting of the Committee held on 27th October 2011 be agreed as a correct record and signed by the Chair.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RECOMMENDATIONS To RESOLVE that:
1) in the event of changes being made to recommendations by the Committee, the task of formalising the wording of those changes is delegated to the Corporate Director Development and Renewal along the broad lines indicated at the meeting; and
2) in the event of any changes being needed to the wording of the Committee’s decision (such as to delete, vary or add conditions/informatives/planning obligations or reasons for approval/refusal) prior to the decision being issued, the Corporate Director Development and Renewal is delegated authority to do so, provided always that the Corporate Director does not exceed the substantive nature of the Committee’s decision.
Decision: The Committee RESOLVED that:
1) In the event of changes being made to recommendations by the Committee, the task of formalising the wording of those changes is delegated to the Corporate Director, Development and Renewal along the broad lines indicated at the meeting; and
2) In the event of any changes being needed to the wording of the Committee’s decision (such as to delete, vary or add conditions/informatives/planning obligations or reasons for approval/refusal) prior to the decision being issued, the Corporate Director, Development and Renewal is delegated authority to do so, provided always that the Corporate Director does not exceed the substantive nature of the Committee’s decision
Minutes: The Committee RESOLVED that:
1) In the event of changes being made to recommendations by the Committee, the task of formalising the wording of those changes is delegated to the Corporate Director, Development and Renewal along the broad lines indicated at the meeting; and
2) In the event of any changes being needed to the wording of the Committee’s decision (such as to delete, vary or add conditions/informatives/planning obligations or reasons for approval/refusal) prior to the decision being issued, the Corporate Director, Development and Renewal is delegated authority to do so, provided always that the Corporate Director does not exceed the substantive nature of the Committee’s decision
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PROCEDURE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS PDF 41 KB To NOTE the procedure for hearing objections at meetings of the Strategic Development Committee. Decision: The Committee noted the procedure for hearing objections.
Minutes: The Committee noted the procedure for hearing objections.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tower House, 38-40 Trinity Square, London EC3N 4DJ PDF 135 KB Additional documents:
Decision: Update report tabled.
On a vote of 2 for and 2 against, with the Chair casting a second vote in favour, the Committee RESOLVED:
1. That planning permission be GRANTED at Tower House, 38-40 Trinity Square, London EC3N 4DJ for the erection of a 9-storey building with basement, comprising a 370-room hotel (Use Class C1) with associated ancillary hotel facilities including cafe (Use Class A3), bar (Use Class A4) and meeting rooms (Use Class B1) with plant and storage at basement and roof level. The application also proposes the formation of a pedestrian walkway alongside the section of Roman Wall to the east of the site; the creation of a lift overrun to facilitate a lift shaft from ticket hall level to platform level within the adjacent London Underground station and associated step free access works; works of hard and soft landscaping; and other works incidental to the application
2. That such planning permission be subject to:
A. The prior completion of the previously proposed s106 package to secure the following: (as detailed in the update report tabled)
Financial Contributions
a) Highways & Transportation: £103,000, comprising: o £3,000 towards monitoring the Travel Plan o £50,000 towards the Legible London wayfinding scheme o £50,000 towards the Cycle Hire Scheme
b) Employment & Enterprise: Up to £108,450 (see contributions h & i below) towards the training and development of unemployed residents in Tower Hamlets to access either: o Jobs within the hotel developmental end-use phase; or o Jobs or training within Hospitality, Leisure, Travel & Tourism employment sectors in the final development
c) Leisure & Tourism promotion: £54,500; comprising: o £26,500 towards developing a destination map of the Borough for visitors o £28,000 towards business tourism promotion and implementing a programme with Visit London to promote Tower Hamlets as a business tourism destination in the UK, European and InternationalMeeting, Incentive, Conference and Exhibition Market
Non-Financial Contributions
d) Delivery of public realm improvements and step-free access works; e) No coach parking or drop-offs / pick-ups from Trinity Square or Coopers Row; f) Code of Construction Practice - To mitigate against environmental impacts of construction; g) Reasonable endeavours for 20% goods/services to be procured during the construction phase should be achieved by businesses in Tower Hamlets; h) Reasonable endeavours for 20% of the construction phase workforce will be local residents of Tower Hamlets or a financial contribution of £30,533 to support and/or provide for training and skills needs of local residents in accessing new job opportunities in the construction phase of new development; i) 59 people residing in Tower Hamlets are given HLTT (Hospitality, Leisure, Travel & Tourism) sector related training or a financial contribution of £35,400 for the delivery of this training; j) Access to Employment - To promote employment of local people during and post construction, including an employment and training strategy; k) Any other planning obligation(s) considered necessary by the Corporate Director Development & Renewal
Total financial contribution: up to £265,950
B. That the additional contributions and obligations as detailed in paragraphs 5.6 to 5.8 of ... view the full decision text for item 7. Minutes: Update report tabled.
At this point, the Chair read out the following statement regarding the above item:
I wish to clarify the position with regards to the report being considered tonight as a deferred matter. Agenda Item 6.1 was debated at the previous Committee on 27 October 2011 as a deferred item. Members voted not to accept the officer's recommendation to approve permission and concerns were raised about the scheme. However no motion was made to refuse the application in accordance with the rules of the Committee. As such, the application was not formally refused by the Committee, and has been treated again as a deferred item. Members should consider the report before them tonight and decide whether they accept the officer's recommendation. If the committee resolves not to accept such recommendation, then a further motion should be moved accordingly.
Pete Smith (Development Control Manager, Planning Services) introduced the circulated reported and the Tabled update report concerning application (PA/11/00163) - Tower House, 38-40 Trinity Square, London EC3N 4DJ.
Mr Simon Ryan (Deputy Team Leader Planning Services) gave an overview of the scheme, explaining the site location, the planning history including the previously approved office scheme. Mr Ryan also explained the nature of the proposals showing views from key points and the step free access works.
Mr Ryan drew attention to the circulated report detailing matter arising since the deferral. Since that time, the Trinity Square Group had requested a screening direction on the proposals. However Officers did not consider that the proposal met the criteria for this in legislation. The Historic Royal Palaces had also provided additional comments which broadly supported and welcomed the development.
Officers also drew attention to Paragraph 2.2 of the report detailing why the Committee were minded to refuse the application on 27th October 2011. Taking in to account these reasons, Officers had since interpreted these views and had suggested possible reasons for refusal (Paragraph 9) and the implications of a refusal.
Mr Ryan also drew attention to the update report including additional representations in support and objection. The update also set out revisions to the Section 106 package which Mr Ryan read out to the Committee. The purpose of which was to clarify the Applicant’s offer with regards to the Employment and Enterprise contribution.
In response, the Chair referred to the recent site visit to the application site. He commented that many Members had viewed and were familiar with the site. He also noted the level of lobbying and the previously approved scheme. However it was necessary that the Committee consider this application on its own merits in accordance with the planning matters.
Members then raised a number of comments and questions. Questions were raised about the step free plans for Tower Hill Station. It was questioned whether this was an essential requirement of any development of that site.
Some concern was also expressed at the impact on the area. A Member remarked that this was a major heritage site, surrounded by ... view the full minutes text for item 7. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PLANNING APPLICATIONS FOR DECISION Nil Items. Decision: Nil Items. Minutes: Nil Items. |